Slaj Cluj Olt and Dolj courts and the Trgu

Roselin67

Athe prevention and combating of illicit drug trafficking and consumption republished with subsequent amendments and additions the performance of one of the actions listed in paragraph. of this article which has both highrisk and highrisk drugs as its object represents a simple crime as a form of the natural crime unit provided by art. para. and of the same normative act. V. The points of view expressed by the appeal courts and district courts Points of view were submitted regarding the legal issue that is the subject of the preliminary question that was referred to the High Court of Cassation and Justice the Panel for the resolution of legal issues in criminal matters by all appeal courts.

The appeal courts of Bacu Cluj Craiova and Trgu Mure have Country Email List not identified court decisions that would have resolved the legal issue that is the subject of the preliminary question. However the Bacu Court of Appeal the  Crbuneti Court expressed the point of view that the provisions of the crime contest must be retained while the Gorj Court and the Reghin Court opined in the sense of the existence of a legal unit of crimes in continuous form and the courts of.



Odorheiu Secuiesc and Ludu specified that the provisions of art. para. of the Criminal Code regarding the complex crime and last but not least the Cluj Court of Appeal specified that the act of the person who in the same circumstance commits actions specific to drug trafficking regarding both highrisk drugs and highrisk drugs constitute a single crime provided by art. para. and from Law no. republished with subsequent amendments and additions. At the level of the Alba Iulia Braov Bucharest Constana Galati Iai Oradea Pitesti Ploiesti Suceava and Timioara appeal courts or the regional courts court decisions were pronounced in relation to the legal issue.